upvote
A pre-trained universal classifier that can replace specifically-trained ones would have been considered just as much science fiction in the 2010's as the capabilities of modern LLMs. I'm not sure Jev is actually there yet, but at least it sounds theoretically doable today.

That being said, one thing having been unrealistic 10 years ago and just about possible today doesn't mean that it's going to change the world the same way another technically related, previously-impossible thing did. The Jev hype gives me a bit of the "you're still early to crypto" vibes of some later altcoins. I really like the idea, I think it's going to open up possibilities for using classifiers where we wouldn't or couldn't have trained one before. I'm crossing my fingers for an open weights version to drop. But it's still just a classifier, people have built similar things before Jev, the one thing that really stands out about it is their ability to generate hype.

reply
> but at least it sounds theoretically doable today

why

reply
We have a bad universal classifier now (via Jev). 0->1, one might say.

A bad universal classifier does suggest a good one later. And that is exactly what I would call "theoretically doable"

That said, I don't think that Jev is a magic breakthrough or anything. I think it is just a particularly good narrative with an easy way to try it out.

reply
deleted
reply
The cheap, fast and smart-enough LLM space has been wildly neglected. Jev is one of the few players truly targeting that space. And for a lot of people it is the first time they are asking "what could I build if llms were interaction-speed fast?". The answers are cool, the problem is that Jev is not, I think, smart-enough yet to have that many applications, but it's smart enough that you can start to see what they will look like.
reply
For what it does, it classifies, orchestrates, operates and delegates tasks exceedingly well for its size and weight. It's ridiculously cheap and efficient, but if you can only see progress in terms of raw cognitive power then you'll surely miss how interesting this is.
reply
It is impressive, but all the hype and fake demos are selling it as a model that is as smart as frontier reasoning LLMs in the decisions it makes yet much cheaper and much faster, which is not true.
reply
Nothing fake here and fully open source if you wanna take a peek. It does make a bunch of mistakes, often. But it eventually recovers!

https://github.com/christianmat/jev-pokemon

reply
I think that misses the point of Jev being ridiculously efficient while maintaining adequate intelligence for automation tasks. We have to train our minds to filter out branding and marketing.
reply
I agree it's overhyped, but the transition to a general purpose classifier (vs a narrow scope classifier) is new and noteworthy.

Ie the famous "Hotdog" clip from Silicon Valley [0]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACmydtFDTGs

reply
Maybe noteworthy but definitely not new. The category of zero-shot classification has been around for a while.

Example (2022):

https://developers.openai.com/cookbook/examples/zero-shot_cl...

reply
Making decisions quickly, cheaply and without having to train your own model.
reply
Math.random can make poor decisions quickly and cheaply
reply
Benchmark it against jev and you'll have your answer.
reply
I mean,

> get stuck in strange loops of going in and out of the same door to no end

Math.random is statistically unlikely to do this.

reply