upvote
Great but you will no longer be paid to do what you love.
reply
History teaches us that understanding deep problems in mathematics finds natural applications elsewhere. So, either AI completely solves mathematics (unlikely for the moment), or we use marginal amount of funding to keep the mathematical communities alive.
reply
I have never been paid to do what I love. Well, I got couple of art grants some years ago.
reply
> To have any deep understanding of that world requires deep understanding of maths, physics, programming etc. that you can only gather by doing those things and solving problems with your meat brain.

There is tons of evidence against that. Someone armed with just LLM, can have much better uderstanding of problem then "meat brain expert" who studied the subject for decades.

We seen in last decades how "experts" are clueless, and how they predictions work.

> don’t really care whether LLM’s can produce code more and better than me

So on one side there is monopoly on "deep understanding", but on other no one really cares about quality?

reply
You are both reading too hastily to quite grasp what I am claiming as well as making claims and assumptions you do not back with evidence. If there is tons of evidence how a person with LLM can understand - I was speaking of the world and times we live in, not just single problem - a problem an expert does, it is quite trivial for you to present that evidence.

Mind you,solving a problem is not same as understanding it. Anyone can just take a science calculator and bunch in some function without understanding anything about how to solve it.

reply
The math can be booth commodity and enjoyment.

My day job is to cleanup mess left over by "experts". They may have very deep understanding, but code they leave behind is full of bugs and security holes.

reply
[dead]
reply