upvote
Care to explain how that would make sense?
reply
They ate pushing to be regulated so they can create a locked down monopoly of 3-4 players where nobody gets to sell legal llm access like open weights. Instant locked down corporate market.
reply
If you got caught breaking an expensive vase but there is no evidence, would you confess your crime? You would lie and make up some story how it wasn't your fault.
reply
This technology is very powerful, and it is (and by extension, so are we) very valuable

Also good story telling for the narrative of “this technology is so powerful that it must be strictly regulated”

reply
I doubt it. At this stage, so many eyes are on the AI industry that regulation is likely to be disadvantageous to industry actors: https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2026/09/wh...

Many people are calling for an AI pause or liability/punishment for bad actors like OpenAI. You have to do serious mental gymnastics to convince yourself that Sam Altman will benefit financially from the new regulatory bloodlust. No surprise that OpenAI hasn't exactly been forthcoming about info related to these hacks.

Furthermore, HuggingFace required an open-weight model to respond to the hack. That certainly blows a hole in the "carefully designed" claim from zx8080, if nothing else. It looks terrible for OpenAI, and decreases the probability of some sort of regulatory restriction on open models.

reply
Wouldnt call it regulatory blood lust at the moment. I think the competitive situation that is however solely focussed in performance at any cost and not at compliance at all is forcing AI labs to play with fire. The risk for them is an even bigger regulatory backlash. Totally different industry : Chinese ebike manufacturers are currently pushing the rules for motor strength to the max due to competition. What will likely happen is stricter regulation of max support and motor power if there are incidents. Particularly there will be more regulatory fragmentation with little common denominator. This will hurt the whole industry's growth. In this industry it kind of still works as an agreement of non-Chinese manufacturers.
reply
What you're saying might be plausible if Dario and Sam didn't take every other opportunity to call for regulation. And that's a massive understatement with Anthropic.

They're facilitating a doomerism cult that is lobbying and clearly making headway in Congress.

You have to put your head in the sand to think open weight models aren't a threat/large revenue loss to their business.

reply
Dario and Sam have been doomers or doomer-adjacent for many years. Occam's Razor is that they simply believe what they are saying. As do many other prominent people:

https://aistatement.com/work/statement-on-ai-extinction-risk

https://www.pacingthefrontier.com/

https://aitreaty.org/

reply
Yeah. If the conspiracy theory was that these incidents were somehow orchestrated by Anthropic, that would at least make some logical sense.
reply
This is a baseless conspiracy theory. Jensen Huang has actually complained that doomerism has reduced interest from investors:

https://www.businessinsider.com/nvidia-jensen-huang-ai-doome...

reply
Yeah, feeding straight into AI is going to kill us marketing that is being pushed and oaid for people to talk about.
reply