Sounds like a great way to end up with people that run 73 agents to create bunch of useless AI harnesses that nobody (including the repo owner) uses.

I think there has to be a better rubric by which person would be evaluated, not just amount of tokens they managed to waste.

> The people that sat around handwringing about tech debt and trying to read every line of LLM code will really struggle to find a job. The profession fundamentally changed, and these people did not catch up.

I'm inclined to agree - the latest models seem to have crossed a threshold where trying to review by hand becomes akin to a manager insisting on reviewing PRs.