upvote
> red tape, bureaucracy, rent seeking, status quo. AI will see through these human constructs.

Why would an LLM care about eliminating any of these things? When you say "red tape" and "bureaucracy" you are, in that very statement, applying emotional labels to what are actually just systems working as designed. There are the rules, so we follow them. LLM decision-makers will happily enforce and perpetuate bureaucracy and red-tape. If the rent-seeking is legal behavior then they will fully protect a big corporation's right to engage in it, they don't care about the feelings of the little guy. If a similar situation was decided a certain way in the past, then yeah let's decide it the same way now and maintain the status quo; LLMs very often think that way, they don't care about human ideals like "change" or "progress".

reply
> AI has the ability to be impartial, and immutable.

Which AI has this ability? LLMs definitly don't.

reply
With an open set of weights, fixed seeds and parameters, recorded inputs and feedback loops, the entire AI decision making process is auditable.

It also lends itself nicely for the ability to adjust the AI systems when deficiencies are found. You can tweak the AI systems to align itself with the desired output, and check for regressions, much like tests in a codebase.

Human decision-making lacks this thoroughness. I’ve scarcely come across rigorous documentation of decisions and how they were reached professionally.

reply
I recommend you the book the rational optimist.

Not saying you’re wrong you just can’t be so certain

reply