upvote
The problem is skilled artisans like musicians and programmers used to be _neccessary_ for the work to be done, now technology means in many cases the practical approach will use machines instead of humans for the majority of cases. handcrafted is better but a luxury. The enjoyment of being needed is what’s lost.
reply
> I don't understand what's difficult about enjoying programming now that LLMs are everywhere. It's akin to musicians who still play their instruments despite having the ability to stream any music they'd like. Nothing's stopping them from playing their instrument. Why is programming any different?

Because a great majority of our colleagues and compatriots – people we believed viewed the art somewhat similarly to how we do – have shown themselves willing to replace their cellos with CDs, their tubas with tapes and their vocal chords with voice-overs!

We find ourselves in an orchestra in which it seems the loud majority will happily proclaim that they're proud to just press play! It's heartbreaking.

I can understand pressing play to put food on the table. That wouldn't make me sad and angry. Seeing so many so proud and happy about it, and doing it also when the stakes are zero, does.

reply
Good points yet how others view the art doesn't affect my enjoyment nor practice of it. Like music, others can enjoy listening to a CD or play their own instrument; I don't care. Why allow others' style and practice influence how we enjoy programming?
reply
Because these "others" are literal members of my orchestra suggesting we start doing playbacks during concerts!
reply