Here are some bugs:
- `ADD m.a.c :inc` update expression wrote a literal top-level m.a.c attribute but didn't change the nested number.
- TransactGetItems returned fields not requested.
- update expression can update the same key multiple times.
replyIn total my conformance suite found 583 failures out of 1279 tests.
Wow! This is not production-ready at all. DynamoDB would be my main use case. I'll stick with DynamoDB local.
replyFunny fact, DynamoDB local fails about 100 of my conformance tests. Mainly around error message formatting and text. Just be careful about parsing those.
replyhttps://paritysuite.org/ You can check this, awesome work they have to check ddb vs real (local ddb also has a lot of diff with real ddb)
reply