Hacker News
new
past
comments
ask
show
jobs
points
by
swagatkonchada
3 hours ago
|
comments
by
reactordev
3 hours ago
|
next
[-]
Because we do. The GPL isn't a suggestion. If you can take open source code and make private software out of it then what are we all doing? No, license requirements and agreement are law for a reason.
reply
by
bloggie
3 hours ago
|
parent
|
next
[-]
Kimi K3 has its own license which is permissive, it isn't at all like GPL
https://github.com/MoonshotAI/Kimi-K3/blob/main/LICENSE
reply
by
dgellow
2 hours ago
|
parent
|
prev
|
[-]
GPL is a specific license, it’s not FLOSS as a whole
reply
by
otterley
3 hours ago
|
prev
|
[-]
Because the licenses that apply to software make no sense in the context of LLMs. With the latter, there is no source code to license.
The words of a license are what the license is.
reply