Is it really about what it offers, or about how each plan are subsidized by Meta and OpenAI?
replydeleted
replyMeta is probably making money off of Muse. They can sell ads with the information that they glean.
replyTrusting Meta literally a bad idea every single time. Like, every single time. Just use some open source stuff, or hell I've been building this for like the past year because I hate these companies: https://blackbear.app
replyWhile there are people around here that would still argue Anthropic/OpenAI tokens are "subsidized", I find it much more plausible that Muse tokens are, given Metas strategy of burning money, including on AI models, in hope of making something happen in a market they want to enter.
replycalling the tokens "subsidized" in a Muse subscription is incoherent. they arent selling the tokens. they are selling a product. the tokens are just part of the cost of making a product just like any other product in existence.
replyThey’ve claimed they’re not using the data for ads… for now
replyThere may be a reason that I cannot access it from the EU. There, they cannot repurpose data they swallowed for another use without consent.
replyIt’s meant for rich casuals. If you watch the presentation, everyone they depicted using it seemed to be in some high paying which collar profession. I.e. it’s for people like the people who work at open ai.
reply