upvote
> You said India is backward today compared to ancient Greece

No, I didn't mean that. I said if Ancient Greece is your yardstick, India would be more than 1000 years behind today without external influence. Ancient Greece was 2000 years ago, not 1000.

> The US has the most people in modern slavery in the Western hemisphere: https://www.walkfree.org/global-slavery-index/country-studie....

Okay, but it's also a huge country the size of a continent, so of course it's got more than most of Western Europe. If Luxembourg had a million modern slaves there'd be nowhere to hide them. And it has much, much more sensitive systems for detecting this sort of thing than India does, so you can imagine that number is not lowballed.

reply
> India would be more than 1000 years behind today

Behind what? And what are you basing this on, other than vibes and your biases?

> without external influence

Of course it would be externally influenced even without being colonized. It isn't an island. It couldn't shut itself away like Japan did pre-19th century. Japan is more modern than India because it wasn't colonized. They just took ideas from abroad - industrialization, mass literacy, (some) democracy (pre-WW2) - and adopted them.

> Okay, but it's also a huge country the size of a continent, so of course it's got more than most of Western Europe

And India isn't?

reply