This is 100% absolutely my experience as well. Especially the needless abstractions and endless rounds of corrections. That was literally my entire last week of work.

> It’s 50/50 on whether it will fuck up implementing an integration test suite when given a list of tests to write and examples of existing tests. It still adds needless abstractions (the reference count codelens in VS Code is good for detecting this sort of thing).

Yes, still running into this, but surprised about this

> On these metrics it is much better than it was in March of 2025 but no better than it was in March of 2026.

I was super hyped at the agentic thing a year ago (Fall 2025), but designing functional software was hell. It would not just "grasp" the right level of "here is the essence of what we need" versus "these are all the small impl details". But idk I feel like Astra's the first model in quite a while that I don't feel genuinely annoyed at handholding a toddler with a PhD.

But I totally believe you on the 50/50 thing. Even recently as a few days ago, Astra did the thing where it ran into an error, and instead of making the sensible bounded decision of "make user retry in this case", it silently built an extremely elaborate recovery state machine w/o looking. These pathologies by no means gone, and I'm still careful in the design phases (which themselves are bounded and incremental) to sus out if Astra's gonna do this kind of RL slop failure mode.

For my use cases personally though, it's been better and better. I can't use AI at work, so you have much harier edge cases than I do, but still.