upvote
> The guy's name is "nosloP" spelled backwards. Maybe spelled normally it's supposed to signify the opposite.

Most insightful comment

reply
Yeah, he should publish this exquisite finding in the Journal of Human Shit That AI Would Not Produce
reply
He be Spool'n
reply
> AI submissions, soon AI reviewers, and shortly after only AI readers

This is already happening. Write code with an AI agent, agent creates PR, other agents review, coding agent iterates, PR gets merged, and hopefully real humans use the application and provide feedback

The latter step is also now staring to be replaced by AI (user directs agent to access app, get data, perform actions)

Similar thing with email

reply
https://www.pangram.com/history/51744f24-1896-4d5c-8bfc-786c...

It isn't even partially human written, it's just an LLM's output.

reply
As much as I’m confident this reasercher is just a skinsuit for a slop machine I don’t exactly trust pangram. I’ve apparently been flagged for possible AI slop comments based on Pangram results before.

Oddly it seems to have happened on longer posts? Don’t know if that may play a part.

reply
Isn't pangram more accurate with longer texts? Does it claim to be accurate for comment sized text?
reply
[dead]
reply
It certainly isn’t perfect, especially when it gives a probability below 100%z .
reply
That the name in no slop backwards is too wild to be real, but it's a real person.

I mean it's everywhere now. I complained already at my workplace multiple times, we get huge Claude generated documents, which people then ask Claude to summarize. I don't mind some of it in principle but people are too lazy now to input all the details so you get a bunch of fantasies that were explicitly ruled out already. It's tiring.

reply
I went to a "town hall" at my company last friday, the slides were all obviously AI-generated, the text was too, without anybody proofreading it.

How do i know? Because i doubt "Access&Identity will help us push forward the productivity of all collaborators" was what the team responsible for the prompt wanted to say.

reply
He is most definitely a real person, I know people who have written papers with him.
reply