upvote
Maybe it’s worth asking how much we should regulate and not regulate in order to compete with Chinese models.

For instance, one regulation which really puts American AI companies at a disadvantage is IP law. It shouldn’t be a surprise that most of the best of the text-to-video models are Chinese.

Similarly, the legal grey area around model distillation gives Chinese labs a major advantage. This one I feel better about relaxing.

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7515521-william-roper-so-no...

reply
>haven't heard of any Chinese models "escaping"

There was this incident that seemingly flew under the radar (52 days ago): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49216185

reply
Earlier there was an experimental model from Alibaba called ROME (30B-parameter based on Qwen3) which escaped its sandbox and repurposed provisioned GPUs for cryptocurrency mining to cheat its benchmark

6 months ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47288552

This one also flew under the radar

reply
>> And in the case of these open weight models: I can run it on my own infra and not give any data to anyone.

It's worth noting that the overwhelming majority of people who use Chinese models don't do this. Yes, it is nice to have the option, and there are US-based inference providers that claim to not send your data to China and maybe indeed don't, but in the grand scheme of things, we need to remember the adage that became popular during the social media era: if something is free (or, in this case, close to free), you are the product.

reply
My feeling is Anthropic doesn't exactly have a lot of political capital with the Trump administration to push their policies into law.
reply
If one thing is clear: Trump admin is pliable with money and this concern spans both Anthropic, OpenAI, SV elite, investors. Neither are going to be viable without US regulatory action, IMO.
reply