upvote
For me, it was this part of the paragraph:

> There is no atlas, so a hundred thousand CJK glyphs cost a font's worth of outline data, not an atlas the size of a video. Text can change every frame at no baking cost, which is exactly what you want for live data, user input, and localized content. And it all happens in a single draw with an ordinary fragment shader, no vendor extension required.

Specifically, these sentence structures:

1. ... so <blah> costs <blah>, not <blah>.

2. And <blah>, no <blah>.

3. ... fixed resolution ahead of time, which quietly ...

reply
They were the trained on human text right? So maybe that is the way human text as whole reads.

Maybe what we are seeing is us internet dwellers being exposed to wiring styles of humanity we had not been exposed to ?

reply
Stuff like this is a giveaway for me:

> Drawing it on a GPU, crisply, at any size, under any 3D transform, while the text changes every frame, is not.

> One small texture, resolution independent within reason, one cheap shader.

English is not my native language, so I may be wrong here.

reply
For me it was "head to head" table. Typical complete nonsense llm-generated comparison table. Rest of the content is still quite good tbh, generated or not
reply
Not arguing whether this article is or isn't LLM-generated, but I've seen skewed comparison tables like that in marketing since before LLMs. Pick a bunch of qualities skewed towards the new thing being proposed, highlight all the ways the new thing wins.
reply
> A note on fairness, because the technical reader will ask.

I think it's a mix of human and LLM writing.

reply