https://www.theregister.com/software/2024/11/15/google-gemin...
replyhttps://www.fastcompany.com/91383271/googles-chatbot-apologi...
https://www.businessinsider.com/gemini-self-loathing-i-am-a-...
They never explained the "please die."
replyDid you just link to an article from 2024 as if 2024 is relevant these days?
replyAbsolutely because none of these models are ever trained fresh. We see the same quirks and personalities carry over into every subsequent generation of OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI models. So Gemini having this latent madness is *extremely* concerning as they reach the point of super intelligence.
replyUntil Google provides some sort of technical debrief, and explains how the same behaviors are impossible today, it is relevant.
replyExperience? Ask it to write a prompt to generate an image and it generates an image instead.
replyI stopped asking it to put me in a photo in different scenarios for laughs because it considers me a public figure. I am not. I've managed to wrangle quite questionable content out of it, but never to slap my face on a meme.
replySee the last gemini message in this thread: https://gemini.google.com/share/6d141b742a13
replyIn my opinion still the most egregious example in history of a commercial LLM going off the rails in production. Never any technical postmortem from Google on this.
It is wild but it was back in 2024 and that's multiple AI lifetimes back.
replyThe problem is newer models are never trained from scratch, they generally just layer on more training data and use the same tools/methods for RLHF. OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI models all have a feel to them that carries over from one generation to the next.
replyPoint is, if Gemini is flawed then there's a very good chance that it's still deeply flawed today, and getting smarter at the same time - that is a very bad combination.
Now I really feel worried for the first time.
replywtfffff that gave me sinister chills. Right up the spine. Wow!
replyWtf I just read
replywow
reply