Corporations do not have a fiduciary duty to seek maximal profits. This is a myth.

They are given wide latitude to decide what's in the best interests of the shareholders. Keeping a less-profitable offering alive just in case the current big offering doesn't pan out in the long term would easily be defensible in court.

It wouldn't even be a challenge. Courts are loathe to question the judgment of directors and executives. The reasoning is obvious: why in the world would a judge have better knowledge of how to run a company than the people whose jobs are to run the company?

In some cases, it seems that lowering resolution and graphics actually produces better DLSS5 output (but it varies)

It's really good at making older gen games look remade/remastered.