Wikipedia is fine. Just make sure the content itself is good and appropriate for Wikipedia (such as no original research) and formatting citations is really least of your worries. When you do it wrong, some other editor will come and fix it.
replyWhat is, and isn't, original research is quite often subjective.
replyJust trust the approved publications chud
replyThe stupidest Wikipedia argument I ever had, was having to cite the fact that bread is sold sliced.
replyYou accidentally found a good example reason for the rule to exist. It's only relatively recently (2019-2021-ish) that Germany had more pre-slided bread move than unsliced loaves.
replyTherefore scoping the claim being made with citations actually does improve the wiki's accuracy.
You can say bread is sold pre-sliced accurately in a colloquial sense, but actually making a claim - as an encyclopedia inherently does - should carry information on how general a claim it actually is.
Where I come from bread is normally not sold sliced. That is the exception.
reply