upvote
I doubt it will change much, inference (not training) is very profitable and demand for inference is quite high. See: Mistral serving GLM on their own servers.
reply
They're too big to fail at this point. US taxpayers will bail them out if push comes to shove.
reply
In that unlikely case, open-weight hosting providers (and Google and Meta and SpaceXAI) would pick up the slack.

The only chance of memory demand going down would be breakthroughs in model size reduction.

reply
The catchup models are all basically distillations of the sota models. Without the next training cycle things are going to stagnate. And as all those companies you mentioned are all linked to OpenAI and Anthropic and relying on hosting deals and things they are all going to be in the ringer when things to go south.

So on the one hand you have all the sota model makers doing investor expectation management in saying wet need a slowdown for safety (may or may not be true, but also means they don’t spend on the next training cycle before IPO? Could be making their books look better too?) and on the other we have a sense that the models aren’t yet at the stopping place where we can just not train another cycle and use distillations of the current generation?

reply
> The catchup models are all basically distillations of the sota models

Source/citation?

reply
Also gpu speedup. If vera Rubin is 7x faster then to serve same number of tokens you need 1/7 the memory. Did I get that right?
reply
They are probably too big to fail already (and too friendly with the current US gov). And even if they fail, open-weight models will take over as the usefulness of the tech behind has been proven.
reply
Sure, and they'll be cognizant of that risk when considering expansion. The lessons of the dotcom fiber boom aren't that distant in memory.
reply
If AI companies have allocation of memory, can't they just sell the memory allocation if they are tight on cash?
reply
I expect them to sell everything if they go bust to recoup what little they can for investors. That would double whack hardware manufacturers are their final consumers are now both leaving the markets as buyers and entering as competitors.
reply
Well, but to who? And for pennies on the dollar, most likely. Also not all ram is made equal. HBM for AI cards isn't LPDDR5 in iPhones.
reply
I don’t think they will. There is too much money in it now.
reply
Only last year Microsoft admitted to having GPUs in inventory that they couldn't power, due to a lack of electricity. So much of this production capacity could very well go into making memory chips for GPUs sitting in a warehouse.

The amount of money spend on the AI hype train is crazy. Meanwhile we're wasting fab time making chips that might never be powered on. It's absolutely insane that there are more money to be made on hardware for AI that may never be used, rather than producing a product that consumers and businesses need right now.

reply
Don't worry, the Trump administration is addressing this by lifting pollution limits for data centers.
reply
But wait, I thought we all agreed that capitalism is the most efficient way to distribute goods in an economy!
reply
I'd argue that this is a form of financial engineering that is somewhat removed from "true" capitalism.
reply
By goods you mean wealth vertically to the oligarchs, then yes.
reply