upvote
You joke but I don't see why mass optimization shouldn't be possible given the cost of mass refactoring went to effectively zero at this point.
reply
Because the LLMs were trained on average software which doesn't give a shit about performance and they'll revert to the mean for sufficiently complicated projects. While they can help with searching for performance improvements, they also are liable to cheat if you aren't reviewing them for correctness of any algorithmic changes. Also you need to be responsible for teaching them the right benchmarks to use, since, again, performance optimization has been niche and not the standard.
reply
Mass refactoring will always compete with mass new product launches and mass new feature production, so it's likely to always lose.
reply
deleted
reply
This has absolutely been a dream of mine. We act like it's the 80s-90s again and optimize all the software.
reply
That's the one silver lining. I've always kept a lean desktop of mostly terminal based programs, and I've heard one too many times "just buy more RAM" as a defense for resource intensive graphical programs using Electron or modern browsers in general.
reply