upvote
It is legal for a person with an appropriate license, yes. But laws (in the US) about RF transmission differ from how many other laws are structured: We're only allowed to transmit what we have permission to transmit -- and by default, we're forbidden.

But right now, I've got an ESP32 WROOM module on a dev board sitting in my windowsill reporting some sensor values over wifi.

The WROOM itself is registered with the FCC[1]. If I stick to using the documented operation, then I have permission to use it in those documented ways. As a practical concept, I don't need a unique license to use it in the way that I am; I'm granted the ability to use it by Part 15 of the FCC rules.

And that's pretty great: The hardware was inexpensive to buy and very easy to find. I was able to spin this sensor up very quickly and get moving on the software side that deals with those readings. It has been a very rewarding little project with a fantastic cost:benefit ratio.

The fear being expressed here (which I don't necessarily subscribe to) is that things like this WROOM module will become less-available when/if methods to use it in undocumented ways are published and start becoming used.

[1]: https://fccid.io/2AC7Z-ESPWROOM32

reply
The FCC is relevant in exactly one country in the world.
reply
Other countries have equivalent organizations and they all tend to be in sync on this stuff.
reply
Thank you. I had no idea! Holy smokes!

(Up next, will you tell all of us that world isn't flat?)

reply
Legal for end-user, sure. But Espressif might run into trouble with regulators like FCC.
reply
Then sell them in the UK, where the FCC is entirely irrelevant.

We treat RF like your lot treat Mexican fireworks.

reply
Our border control confiscates Mexican fireworks.
reply