I must admit I only watched a clip, not the full interview. The quote I’m remembering was something along the likes of AI being more dangerous than nukes. In literally no circumstance is that true. One is a literal nuclear bomb. You wouldn’t say that a nuke is as dangerous as AI, which logically must be true if the reverse is true. You also wouldn’t say a diagram of a nuke is more dangerous than an actual nuke …
replyWhile I could give you a brief explanation of the context around this statement which makes it seem a lot more realistic and sensible, I suggest it is better if you watch the video and get the context yourself.
replyA lot of what he said there would sound like alarmist bs if you take it out of context.
Anyone with the capabilities to do bioterrorism doesn't need AI he can just buy a textbook or use google. Same for all complex forms of destructive thought.
reply