Maybe if you consider the wealth of the in group vs out group. It makes more sense to me that way. Scary how few people it might need to keep the world from moving forward.
replySocial movements come in all sizes. Its a bunch of people who all agree on something. That is a social movement.
replyYou can call it a subculture or philosophy or movement, but social movement to me implies something with broad appeal.
replyAgreed. If society is unmoved, it wasn't a social movement.
replyIt is a social movement of note and importance because of the power wielded by its adherents.
reply> It is a social movement of note and importance because of the power wielded by its adherents.
replyWe should tax the shit out of them, if only to reduce the unelected power their wealth buys.
Just like we should tax the shit out of the non-EA ultra wealthy.
We can have a democratic society or we can have the concentration of great wealth in the hands of a few. We cannot have both.
I strongly agree, but I don't think the USA is capable of doing that. That sort of socialist communitarianism is at odds with the objectivist individualism that they commonly valorize, and underpins most of their heroic stories.
replyA better term would be an 'order'
replyHow about "conspiracy" then?
replyIt’s another bubble that a handful of people invented for themselves to insulate them from the reality of the effect on the world. It’s one of the most genuinely pathetic “movements” I’ve ever seen.
reply