upvote
>Not a lot of good reasons to upgrade to 27.

There's a singular very good reason to upgrade to 27 and any new version (at least when a .1 minor version is out and the kinds have been ironed): the whole ecosystem works better when you are on the latest stuff.

So unless you have legacy app needs, or need ultra stability for stuff like running a video shop or something, it makes sense to keep up, or at least don't fall more than 1-2 versions behind.

>They removed Rosetta and you have to reinstall that if you want it.

And they'll kill it entirely in a future version. It's been like 6 years for getting apps to Apple Silicon versions. And it's generally not ideal to run both AS and Intel programs if you can avoid it (wastes double the system lib memories, Intel misses some extra protections, etc).

>I switched to MacOS 3 years ago

OK, this explains it. So macOS is not like Windows where you can have even 15 years old version of the OS and programs still work forever.

reply
Nearly everything is improved and the new Siri is great.
reply
Unless you're not running an M-series chip, then it's not really improving anything
reply
If you're not running an Apple Silicon chip, you can't run macOS 27 at all.
reply
That's 6+ year old hardware then, so even in Apple's world, that's pretty old.
reply
If a temporary tool being retired is the reason you switch, then wait until you find out how many LOC are being deleted from the linux kernel this year and next
reply
It's not a temporary tool for people who need it.
reply
The alternative is maintaining backwards compatibility forever and then everyone will complain about some weird behaviour that still happens to retain that compatibility.

Keep in mind this is the second time they have switched arches and the second round of complaints of Rosetta removal.

reply
Exactly, I remember getting similar replies - though probably on /. then - when the PPC emulator was removed, there are always some people eager to ridicule the idea and portray it as not being feasible. But it is. It is perfectly doable for a company like Apple with a net worth around $4.87 trillion and would probably take less disk space then the AI models their customers now try to remove because they don't need them. As ridiculous as this may sound to the naysayers, I desire very much for an operating system to keep backwards compatibility forever, it can be done and would be very useful for many people.

I didn't want the PPC emulator removed and I don't want the x86 emulator to be removed either. If that makes me a weirdo, so be it.

reply
I think they have a lot more reason to keep it around this time. PowerPC was a dead-end and x86 is most definitely sticking around.
reply