Customers who what privacy protections for AI chats are welcome to negotiate this in enterprise contracts. The major LLM vendors do offer that as an option. Customers can then enforce any violations in civil court (although this obviously wouldn't apply if the customer used the LLM for criminal purposes).
reply> welcome to negotiate this in enterprise contracts
replyI really hope you mean that in an insulting way to the industry and current legal situation, not as an actual solution.
Where's the insult? Lots of customers have such agreements.
replyOr something like leaking every non-corporate ChatGPT user's chat logs (including temporary chats) to the NY Times.
replyOr making up stuff
replyDon't know why this got downvoted? This is a problem with epistemics.
replyIt's more efficient to have one central "verifier" for everything, but the "who watches the watchers"? question basically says: Either constrain by construction, have everyone verify (which are two sides of the same coin, btw, when looking at a "global" thing), or centralize explicitly.