undefined

points

[-]

I'm sure they're done electronically in some places: Your passport details are appended to the shared Google Spreadsheet...

I'm only half joking: I used to work in payments, hotels didn't care about PCI. Full card numbers stored everywhere.

by toyg11 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

I know, and that's really the thing: nobody cares, not the government and certainly not the hotels.

by rithdmc11 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

I don't think my at-the-time employer cared much, either :)

by 12 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

deleted

by GJim12 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

> This said, these days it could be done electronically

Are you 'avin a laugh mate?

A photocopy of my passport is going nowhere and is shreadded afterwards. An electronic copy..... God lord.

The GDPR also requires data deletion once you no longer need it; physical as well as electronic. This is common sense, and why some organisations don't do this is simply mind boglling.

by toyg11 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

The whole point is that the hotel would not even get a copy, the machine would just send hashes around and the hotel would only get an anonymous transaction ID to store. It would probably be even more secure than what you have today at the airport.

If you think photocopies kept in some folder accessible to anyone working in the hotel, with a promise to delete it at some point, is "secure" in any way, I don't know what to tell you.

by preg_match4 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

I’m sure this can be done, but somehow I doubt it.

When I toured apartments they would often take a photocopy of my ID. Okay, overkill. But realistically I have no idea where that photocopy is stored.

Probably in a OneDrive somewhere to this day.

by GJim10 hours ago|

parent|

prev|

[-]

Good lord!

Rather a paper data breach exposed to a few hotel employees than eletronic data exposed to the entire planet!

by tlb10 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

When paper data is breached, the crooks don't steal the paper and put in their own locked file cabinet. They take pictures of the documents and sell the data on the dark web. So the end result is the same.

by mainecoder10 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

the will need to take a picture everytime they are lazy but stealing all the people who ever stayed at that hotel is a simple copy past taking less than 10 minutes

by sib4 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

Yeah, honestly I'd prefer the remote, simple hotel makes a physical photocopy which at least has a chance of being thrown out after a couple of weeks vs the government of "random country" gets a digital copy which will never, ever, ever be deleted.

by astura9 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

Ironically, that would enable tracking much more than the normal case, which is a hotel stores the scans on a hard drive on the closet that nobody every looks at unless they get a subpoena.

by toyg9 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

That's not what happens in Italy, at least - the documents are scanned and uploaded to a police portal in less than 24h. I expect that's roughly the same elsewhere. (I honestly did not know until today, I just knew the police would come every night to collect copies - good to see some modernization...)

by carlosjobim12 hours ago|

prev|

[-]

All these giant data leaks are coming from the government's "tamper proof" systems!

by toyg11 hours ago|

parent|

[-]

I know, and it's really the trade-off whenever this sort of system is centralized: you can better secure the leafs, but the central repository becomes an even juicier target.

This said, the police already has a database with these info, and it likely is somehow already on the network, so adding an api (if done properly) would not dramatically alter the exposure profile.