upvote
That’s true except for this part, which is arguably a bigger deal for the Wikipedia ecosystem:

> Excessive data downloading: Agents we believe to be operated by OpenAI made millions of automated requests to our public APIs to access the knowledge on Wikimedia projects, crawled millions of pages (mainly from our projects Wikidata and Wikimedia Commons), and made hundreds of thousands of data queries to the Wikidata Query Service (WQDS). This traffic may have contributed to a partial outage on WQDS in May.

Even when agents are well-behaved and browsing Wikipedia for ethical reasons, the system wasn’t designed for this kind of load from bots. As OP says, we don’t need to accept this as the new normal.

reply
>we don’t need to accept this as the new normal.

I think we will, actually.

OpenAI and other companies within the reach of the US legal system will eventually get their agents under control, or get sued out of existence.

But overseas operators in loosely-governed parts of the world (russia, nigeria, etc) will someday have access to these tools. And while OpenAI's agents were merely uncaring, these ones will be intentionally malicious.

The arms race for scammers, hackers, and botnets will escalate. We'll need new ways to block and fight back against them.

reply
comment deleted, fuck dang with a rusty cactus, this is retaliation for a rate limit
reply