upvote
This is what happens when Claude writes it for you (and you don't review it)
reply
So, Claude claims a new discovery and then someone else's Claude writes the blog posts. It would be helpful if I could get Claude to read this for me and post dejected HN comments in response.
reply
You can! And I believe many do. But please don't.
reply
It's not perfect by any means, but Pangram indicates 100% human written. Remember people can be quite foolish without any machine assistance.
reply
I also like how they explained ferromagnetism as being arranged atomic magnets. Magnets all the way down.
reply
Yeah, and it's not even an accurate explanation either.

> The common one, the fridge magnet, is ferromagnetic — its atomic magnets all point the same way (up or down), adding their magnetic effects.

Ferromagnets typically have domains with magnetic moments that point in different directions. Ferromagnets can have a net magnetic moment without every 'atomic magnet' pointing the same way.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_domain

Refrigerator magnets in particular are usually magnetized as Halbach arrays, where the whole point is that the 'atomic magnets' are not pointing in the same direction. This is more energetically stable, which allows you to use cheaper materials.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refrigerator_magnet

Lastly, I believe most refrigerator magnets are actually ferrimagnetic, not ferromagnetic. (The distinction doesn't matter much for users of magnets, but is important for the materials scientists studying and designing them.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrimagnetism

reply
Their opus credits were out after finding the superconductor and they got their local cpu running gpt2 to write the intro?
reply