upvote
I think this comes down to the DEM they are using. I think it would have come out better if they had used USGS 3DEP DTM at 25cm.

Edited: which apparently is hosted for free on AWS S3.

reply
ah, I think this is related to SF's "Slow Streets" program and a genuine bug in the parser.

Cabrillo is a Slow Street, and the parser read its "destination-only" tag as closed to pedestrians, so the tool couldn't see the street at all (and started you a block over?). fixed and deployed; your trip should now go Cabrillo → 23rd → Geary.

reply
“genuine bug in the parser” -> red flag for slop for those keeping track at home
reply
Also "fixed and deployed; your trip should now go Cabrillo → 23rd → Geary". The snappy sentence at the start and the unicode arrows are both pretty big flags for AI writing.

Obviously it's fine to use AI for projects like these, but copy-pasting the response from a coding agent doesn't quite sit right with me.

reply
No, as someone who writes a cycle routing engine by hand, this stuff is endemic when dealing with the trifecta of complex traffic regulations, inconsistent mapping data, and user preferences.
reply
Looking at the repository [1], there are very strong signs for this being LLM generated. The README.md just smells of LLM tells, and Claude Code is being listed as "contributor".

I agree that the tone the parent commenter used wasn't the nicest but unfortunately, factually he is correct.

[1] https://github.com/almostimplemented/flattensf

reply
No need to be a jerk.
reply