I sort of agree, but there is a balance. Destroying a small portion of old growth to develop humans? Great!

Destroying millions of acres of old growth for cattle farming, which is essentially a luxury for human food, meh.. maybe we’re better off growing cattle in other places that are more suited to it, and eating less beef so that nature in those forests can continue nourishing those parts of the earth.

Some uses of the earth are good for both humans and their environment, and some are good for humans in the short term but at the cost of long-term sustainability.

And if we do things that aren’t sustainable then we use up valuable resources, when doing things in a more balanced way could support and benefit humans indefinitely.