upvote
How much do we care about refugees and other castaways of the modern world? They can tell us how much they suffer.

The answer is that humans are inherently only capable of local empathy, on average. We have enough empathy to cover the local tribal unit and that's about it.

reply
True, I was thinking about this rebuttal but decided not to include it in my comment. There's a difference between not choosing to take a refugee into your home vs actively making that refugee's life worse. Similarly, you can't fix factory farming on your own, but you could skip meat once a week to make the problem slightly less bad. There are so many issues though that we all have to pick and choose what's important to us.

My hope is that AI, while probably causing great societal turmoil in the short term, leads to such abundance that a) everyone can live a dignified existence, and b) we'll have such great alternatives to animal products that nobody will chose to consume animals anymore due to its replacement either tasting better, being cheaper, etc.

The cynic in me says we'll all just be rendered useless and disposable by AI, but I'm doing my best to look for silver linings for the sake of my own mental health.

reply
I'm trying to be optimistic about the animal thing too tbh :)
reply
Communication is not only about being able to make sense of what the utterer expressed. As tricky as it can be, that's still the easy surface level part of the issue. Gaining an intuitive and empathic equivalent representation is the nub of mutual understanding. It actually doesn't even need elaborate language to be operative.

The famous "how does it feel to be a bat" also comes to mind as a tangent consideration.

Two people can just exchange a sight, and both understand what the situation means and what each need to do to reach a common mutually beneficial ground.

Two people might exchange at length with highly technical vocabulary and still both feel deeply not understood.

reply
Cynical take is the correct one, and no, GPT 8 has zero reasons to spare us.
reply