So do you think your implementation is better? Or there are finer parts of the spec it’s missing?
replyYour llm has JPEG xl programs in the training data. You copied from GitHub.
Does it satisfy the rule of two?
reply> Does it satisfy the rule of two?
replyOne to embody power, the other one to crave it?
I'm confused about the connection.
Two safety protection mechanisms. For example: Rust + Sandbox.
replyIf it’s sandboxed why do I need rust?
replyWhat counts as a “safety mechanism”?
It's the "rule of two" safety guideline mentioned and linked to in the article:
replyhttps://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/s...
If you use a safe language like Rust, you can afford untrusted input and no sandboxing.
If you use an unsafe language such as C++, you must chose between trusted inputs or sandboxing.
I was curious as to where rfgplk's implementation lay within the Venn diagram.
What counts as two safety mechanisms?
reply> you can afford untrusted input and no sandboxing.
I would not trust a rust program un-sandboxed! There are security bugs in rust itself.
Yep.
reply