upvote

points

by wren69916 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby gzalo6 hours ago|
next
[-]
Most people would say that Ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation or static recompilation is not considered traditional emulation.
reply
upvoteby pjmlp4 hours ago|
parent|
next
[-]
We called emulation back in the last century and it hasn't changed.

The original hardware doesn't exist on the target system.

Taking a famous example out of many others I could have reached for,

> Emulation had been around for a while as a concept, but FX!32 went one stage further. It analyzed the way programs worked and, after the program ran, used binary translation to produce dynamic-link library (DLL) files of native Alpha code that the application could execute the next time it ran. This way even in the early 1.0 release, the FX!32 achieved speeds for Win32 x86 applications that ran 40-50% as fast as native x86 code, with a 70% speed projected as likely with improved optimization. Version 1.5, released by Compaq in 1999, added support for the Alpha 21264 (EV6) CPU, including emulation of Intel's MMX instruction set.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FX!32

reply
upvoteby rowanG0776 hours ago|
parent|
prev|
[-]
You are no longer emulating the CPU but the rest of the system you are absolutely emulating. So I think it's very close to traditional emulation.
reply
upvoteby wren69915 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
The CPU is also in a bit of a funny place because the transpiled C++ looks to be translating instructions into manipulation of a MIPS CPU state object.

https://github.com/jessicanataliagta/PSPRecomp/blob/main/src...

reply
upvoteby Rohansi3 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
That's almost what WINE does which is, apparently, not an emulator. Small reimplementation of Windows userspace and translates DirectX to Vulkan/OpenGL. So if I do x86 -> ARM binary translation AOT and run that with WINE, is it an emulator?
reply
upvoteby wvenable4 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
It appears to me like an emulator where the binary is just compiled in based on the huge amount of code like this:

https://github.com/jessicanataliagta/PSPRecomp/blob/main/pro...

reply
upvoteby mawadev2 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
That made me chuckle
reply
upvoteby tra36 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
I think of an emulator as a separate project/product typically. Perhaps that's what they are saying?
reply
upvoteby wren69915 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Yeah, maybe that's the difference. I was trying to probe the semantics, not so much a "gotcha". Parts of this stack are quite bespoke for this one game.
reply