upvote
No, that's not what happened in this thread at all.

There's a recurring pattern on HN where any time someone talks about knocking dozens of personal projects off their list - things that almost certainly would never have actually been addressed in the finite span of a normal life, the way things go - and you AI doomers show up and demand receipts as though that's a total reasonable and definitely not obnoxious request.

It's like if you tell someone that you love your partner and they demand to sit in the cuck chair or else you're obviously lying. I keep hoping people will move past this "prove that you're actually productive" reflex, but it just keeps happening in basically every AI thread.

In reality there are many reasons not to list out projects that you've worked on with LLMs, and while "none of your damn business" is always going to be at the top, the simple truth is that I want my products and projects to be judged by what they do and how well they work, not by how they were made.

reply
> "There's a recurring pattern on HN where any time someone talks about knocking dozens of personal projects off their list"

Nobody was talking about that very believable use case. What they specifically said was "enterprise scale projects". Enterprise scale means lots of users, decades of backwards compatibility, regulation compliance, logging and auditing, reporting, role based access control and permissions, integration with other enterprise systems, etc. etc.

> "you AI doomers show up and demand receipts as though that's a total reasonable and"

Asking what large scale programs they have built is not "dooming". It's also not demanding. It's also not unreasonable.

> "definitely not obnoxious request".

Saying that it's "unreasonable and obnoxious" to ask people to justify their claims is where the likes of Theranos and Nikola electric truck company are hiding. If they don't want to talk about their stuff, they could have not commented. Since they commented it's reasonable to ask them about what they said.

reply
> What they specifically said was "enterprise scale projects". Enterprise scale means lots of users, decades of backwards compatibility, regulation compliance, logging and auditing, reporting, role based access control and permissions, integration with other enterprise systems, etc. etc.

Do you really think that's what they meant?

reply
> I can do things it took teams years to build as a hobby project over a weekend.

That is a pretty strong statement. And without even anecdotal evidence, it becomes very weak.

reply
Nobody owes you evidence.
reply
You misread a comment so badly that you ended up responding to a completely different and made up comment. Your unwillingness to admit that you were wrong is way worse than whatever reflex you are ranting about.
reply
>I want my products and projects to be judged by what they do and how well they work

Hence the question "what's the most impressive and useful thing you have made"

But no one really has any examples. Just half baked slop they never got over the finish line.

reply
Ladies and gentlemen, the cuck chair is going to be occupied tonight!
reply