upvote
> what they actually want is for everyone else to be told to slow down while they somehow pay for a loophole to allow them to go a little faster for competitive advantage.

It’s hilarious that you can write this and then act befuddled as to why they would therefore want laws as an external (and ideally impartial) coordination device.

Thinking this is a super unique scenario just reveals your ignorance of both 1) game theory and 2) actual industrial history. An industry asking for regulation to stop a race to the bottom is not atypical at all.

reply
> An industry asking for regulation to stop a race to the bottom is not atypical

I didn't say, or even imply, that it is. Just that it is unusual, historically speaking, to see it being pushed for so strongly just a couple of years¹ into general public awareness. Either because previously things didn't move so quickly or, more likely, because the leading companies had more moat initially to keep other adopters moving slower.

--------

[1] talking about LLMs and related tech, image targetting models have been in the public awareness for a fair while longer but they are not the primary concern for most.

reply