The effects are comically bad. I see the inspiration in scrolling effects that the New York Times put together, but the NYT was never dumb enough to obscure the copy text. Form follows function, and the function of a web page is to be read, not to obscure what is to be read with some stupid effect that's supposed to remind one (I suppose) of a volcano's cloud obscuring one's vision. At least "under construction" banners didn't obtrude upon the copy text.

What's wrong with the 90s, we had great fun.

I say we bring back this kind of whimsy like we had with early GeoCities where things could be "bad" but fun instead of "quality" but formal.

Also all the fonts, its quite unreadable in general somehow even before the 'effects'

Maybe. But for now, for me, I find them amusing.

I loved it and it brought me joy.

I mostly agree, I still read and enjoyed it but part of me kept snagging on the fx and wishing it was way way turned down.

I didn't read it beyond few fragments about meteorite. But I enjoyed the rhino.

Except for the rhino, I must admit I liked the effects.

The distance between an idea and the manifestation of said idea is now nearly zero. That goes for both the good and bad varieties. That’s pretty cool, but also pretty terrible.