upvote

points

by rvz21 hours ago |
comments
upvoteby patrickk9 hours ago|
next
[-]
The sheer irony of this would be a thing to behold
reply
upvoteby saagarjha17 hours ago|
prev|
next
[-]
What do you plan to do with a reverse engineered nvcc?
reply
upvoteby rvz16 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
Why wait months for Nvidia to fix their compiler bugs when its far more faster to do it in the open? Libraries that invoke nvcc don't want to wait either.

So really closed-source compilers are a hindrance and you're subject to unspecified time-frames to even get to fix your issue rather than doing it yourself.

Intel and AMD have already open up theirs without question. Nvidia is the one who claims to be supporting openness in AI but can't even open up nvcc let alone CUDA.

reply
upvoteby saagarjha16 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
I think you will spend far longer trying to fix all the bugs introduced by your AI decompilation.
reply
upvoteby docjay9 hours ago|
parent|
[-]
And then you can use Claude-Magnum to fix the issues.

And then you can use Claude-Oeuvre to fix the issues.

And then you can use GPT-Cosmos to fix the issues.

And then you can use Claude-Omnibus to fix the issues.

And then you can use Claude-Logos to fix the issues.

reply
upvoteby echelon19 hours ago|
prev|
[-]
> CUDA

That's insanely meta.

I guess everything is going to become recursive. RSI on models. Everything feeding back into its own hill climbing optimization.

Humans nudging it up the hill further and further by using new geometric guidance.

reply