upvote
I handed Astra Ghidra with some printer driver exes/dlls loaded, and a Windows 2000 VM with the software installed and said "reverse engineer this printer driver, it's hooked up and powered on on /dev/ttyUSB0, tell me when you're ready to print a test page". No refusals.
reply
I did more or less the same and was insta-banned by OpenAI for life. Stay safe out there.
reply
What? What software did you try to reverse, Ive never heard of anything even close to this
reply
Really just a few attempts at cybersecurity related things (not even RE) with ChatGPT/Codex triggered a warning of breaking ToS by email. A few days later I was banned. No appeal.

My conclusion is that OpenAI will help you with cybersecurity and never really block or prevent you from doing the work, but then suddenly warn and/or ban you. Anthropic does the opposite, where they trigger safeguards all the time while working, but never really ban you.

Also, while you may have never heard of this happening I found countless threads on Reddit with frustrated people having been banned from OpenAI for using it for cybersecurity. Since all I’m using AI for is cybersecurity, it’s hard to know exactly why I was banned since they don’t say exactly why.

reply
[dead]
reply
Reverse engineering and decompilation is not currently blocked by the models, leading to the proliferation of LLM-assisted decomps/recomps. If you ask it to find bugs you're more likely to get a refusal, but simply pointing an LLM at a Ghidra MCP server and telling it to trace program flow, rename functions, or answer questions behaves like normal.
reply
Yes, it just rejected me once with Claude Code Opus 5.5, but it works fine with Codex 6.1-Sol (in my experience, it was the other way around)
reply
I think people said that Claude refuses to work on RE sometimes.

I've had no issues with OpenAI.

reply
Ironically, I've had the opposite experience. My OpenAI account was permanently banned for doing too much RE work, meanwhile the worst I get on Claude is a downgrade to Opus 4.8.
reply
Oh, that's interesting. Mind sharing how much was 'too much'?
reply
It was three strikes, I would get notified over email for each one and the third strike got my account banned. I guess the strikes are one step up from the automatic guardrail refusal messages, I would get one after getting too many refusals in a row or I guess when I did work the model deemed 'particularly sensitive'?

I tried to appeal, hoping their automated system would take pity on me but predictably it was instantly denied lol

Now granted, I was doing actual offensive cybersecurity work without being enrolled in the cyber program, and I have plenty of spare alternate accounts anyway so it wasn't that big of a deal. It actually already net me a few 0days, so their guardrails aren't very effective.

reply
I’m not the person you’re replying to, but for me just a few attempts at doing cybersecurity related things (not even RE) with ChatGPT triggered a warning by email. A few days later I was banned. No appeal.
reply
Opus 5.5 hasn't given me much trouble with games, but for DRM and licensing checks I usually have to drop down to 4.8 or 4.6.
reply
The Chinese labs aren’t constraining their models as much as Western labs do. That’s why HF used GLM. If you remember the early times with how Gemini (Bard then) and Claude refused almost everything, you’d despise the idea of guardrailing. (Its important in some areas though)
reply
[flagged]
reply