I'd say you're fully off the mark here. That page contains serious architectural insight on how to make a "designed" car feeling work within a "physically correct" collision engine. Getting the balance right is super hard and he explains how to do it. I'm confident no AI could do that architecture, so this is most likely hours of hard work with a thin layer of LLM gloss on top.
replyNo, I don't want to see the prompt. Yes it has some llm tics, but it's clear that he went back and forth before arriving at this. Why would I be interested in the transcript?
replyPangram says the first half is human and second half is gen AI.
replyRan out of steam, I guess...
Why didn't you check each sentence manually for signs of LLM use, and instead sloppily let Pangram do it for you?
replywell here's the thing - i did! i smelled the 50/50 and then gave it to Pangram. Neither my nose and Pangram are 100% accurate, but when they both get a hit I'm pretty confident.
replyYes, I let the AI generate the diagrams from the code, a bit like tools such as "Doxygen" would in the olden days.
replyI was a bit pushed for time, and didn't feel inclined to try making the diagrams myself.
Still, I agree that they're a bit "slop adjacent". However, I thought they would be better than nothing for someone trying to get their bearings.. and I did iterate on them a bit to get them to be more useful than the initial clanker efforts!
yes and? someone sharing the details of an extremely popular project is super cool. comments like this will not encourage more people to share more cool things.
replyI'd be ecstatic if more people used AI to share more cool things they've done. that'd be awesome. more of this blog post please.
But very little of the author shines through here, at least after the intro. I, too, would like to hear more about how someone built stuff, but this is not it.
replyThis is good shit
reply