upvote
How is this “great”?
reply
reply
Scaleway doesn't have a search engine?

Google ASN is at 98.7% https://radar.cloudflare.com/traffic/as15169

reply
Both of them are search engines; web page crawling is what they do; What did you expect?
reply
I'm reading schleck8 comment as accusing Yandex ASN as malicious on grounds of having higher bot % traffic than Scaleway / comparably sized Cloud Provider.

It could be malicious, but that exact stat doesn't show that.

reply
deleted
reply
I never understood whataboutism.
reply
It's not whataboutism to call out a proving too much fallacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proving_too_much
reply
Thanks!
reply
Where you saw whataboutism?

Implication was that tons of malicious traffic originate from there. I pointed out that bot % stat doesn't seem to be useful for determining that, Occam's razor and all.

reply
Watch as all the good patriotic soccer mom bots with AI generated midwestern white lady profile photos disappear from X and similar social media all suspiciously at the same time.
reply
And bot traffic from Yandex is down 100% as of this moment according to the graphs.

People on X comment on the noticeable drop in bot comments.

reply
Agree: not great not terrible.

Great will be when all huge data center are visited by free range unknown drones, like what happened to the Wildberries.

reply
Is there something better about small data centres?
reply
It's in Russia, that's why.
reply
It's just karma, Russians fascists reaping what they sow.
reply
[flagged]
reply
[flagged]
reply
Exhibit A for russian culture: racial slurs, death threats, mentions of rape in the username.
reply
It really is kind of funny how the crazies, when left alone with themselves too long, turn into their own best counterprogramming.
reply
“That country over there is full of Nazis!” That does explain why they want in so bad then, doesn’t it.
reply
Such a tragic miscommunication. Could have asked to be invited to the jew-nazi-homo party and got a welcoming vodka shot at the door. That however require free will, which is in a short supply over there.
reply
[flagged]
reply
Can you speak a bit more clearly? Something muffles the sounds.
reply
[flagged]
reply
How much does Vlad pay today for such a comment? Is it worth it?
reply
[flagged]
reply
[flagged]
reply
They could have even more moral superiority by giving up, but moral superiority is not the goal
reply
People are allowed to defend themselves man. In this case, economic pressure is the only thing that's likely to work medium term.
reply
deleted
reply
It isn't. It doesn't affect Yandex's own services, but ruins thousands of businesses and projects hosted there. Even if you hate Amazon or Google, you probably wouldn't want AWS or Google Cloud datacenters destroyed by Iran, because that would just affect innocent users.
reply
I did not expect Russian shills on Hackernews.

Destroying heating units in Ukraine also affects innocent users in much worse ways than losing a datacenter.

reply
There are plenty of them, unfortunately.
reply
They have been here for years. Majority of them are the Russians that live and work outside Russia
reply
I am not a Russian shill. I fully support Ukraine and do not support the Russian war crimes. This doesn't help stop them, it just harms random people who happen to live in a war criminal dictatorship.
reply
"harms random people who happen to live in a war criminal dictatorship."

The vast majority of Russians loved the war mostly because they made lots of money from it. Just when Ukraine started hitting oil infra people no longer liked the war. I am sorry for those 10% of Russians who didn't want the war and can't move abroad.

reply
Where is 10% coming from?

20% of Russians were ready to vote for an anti-war party in the last elections before it was illegally removed from the ballots, and many more don't support the war. The people who do are mostly old or live in small towns with no access to education. I doubt many of them are Yandex Cloud users.

reply
Surveys on the approval of Putin and the invasion of Ukraine in 2014 showed numbers between 80% - 90% of people approving the war.

I assume - one would need to check - that the majority of people who left Russia after 2022 did not support the war, so those left should be on the lower end.

"20% of Russians were ready to vote for an anti-war party in the last elections"

Yes, as I've said, approval dropped when Ukraine hit oil infra and gas prices went up, I can see 20% as a number. Nevertheless as show by approval ratings after 2014, that number was lower until people got hit by the impact of the war themselves.

reply
Sounds accurate!
reply
How did they make money from the war? The war is a huge burden on the Russian economy
reply
Families of people who signed up for the war got large amounts of money. The transfer of money from the Russian national wealth fund into the economy, together with the shortage of workers, increased salaries.

[Edit] People didn't keep that money but spent it so others profited from that money too.

This is what happens in wars - beside war racketeers - salaries go up. There is a lot of research on how German profited from WW2 (and before) for example for most of the war. WW2 too seems most researched from what I see on how everyone profits until things get worse and end.

reply
a "war chest" is usually saved by the state (by under-investing into everything civilian) and then given back to the working-class population as salaries, sign-up bonuses, investment into logistic infrastructure. If you look up the stats - there was a real-estate boom in the early years of the was as many families could finally take a mortgage. Now many cannot pay for it because the bonuses and soldier salaries "don't last" hence companies like "Samolyot" are now in trouble.
reply
You understand that a country's military capacity depends on its economy right?
reply
Putin is a psychopath who doesn't care about anything. He gets money for the war anywhere he can. If 99% of the Russian economy gets destroyed, he'd redirect the remaining 1% to fully fund the war.
reply
> If 99% of the Russian economy gets destroyed, he'd redirect the remaining 1% to fully fund the war.

This is impossible, even in a dictatorship.

reply
I do wonder about the internal mental calculus of a Putin-like dictator, essentially, "how far can I push this before I end up like Ceaușescu or Mussolini?". Not anywhere near as far as an actual 99%, I think.

The starvation years of the DPRK in the mid 1990s directly after the collapse of the Soviet Union might be the closest that such a state has come to the situation getting so dire that the people could have theoretically risen up, no matter the consequences, but for a myriad of reasons the North Koreans were unable to.

reply
Putin does not have absolute power entirely on his own (no dictator truly does). He can only continue with what he is doing because the Russian population on average either actively supports him or is not working against him.
reply
If literally 99% of the Russian economy was destroyed, no matter how currently oppressed they presently are, the Russian people are likely to rise up and remove Putin. It'll be bloody as all hell but if the economy were to truly and completely collapse (let's say, all refineries were severely hit and taken out of commission for months), it would happen.
reply
Same millions of random people who eager to enlist, travel thouthands kilometers and die in a ditch in Ukraine in exchange for some extra cash.

Same random people who works and support military machine with money and labor.

reply
As far as I'm concerned, Ukraine can do no wrong in this conflict (within reason obviously). Russia has been hitting civilian targets, specifically trying to take civilian lives, since day one.

The more damage Ukraine does to them the better. Maybe then these Russians who allegedly don't like Putin will get their shit together and do something about him. He's their responsibility. They are, like it or not, supporting his war simply by existing in the Russian economy. If the entire country really wanted him gone they could get him gone.

reply
One important part of the war is to break up the 'deal' Putin has with the Russian population where he can stay in power and do what he likes so long as he doesn't mess with their lives too much. It's important that the everyday Russian is woken up to the realities of the war because it's ultimately them that will be stopping it, one way or another.
reply
The random people can blame the autocratic government led by Putin and co., not the victim of their aggression which is trying to defend itself.

Downplaying the role of aggressor and portraying the victim as somehow to blame is really something, which leads me to think that you either did not fully think this logic through or that you are a Russian shill.

reply
“That is thy loss. A small crack might let in some wisdom.”
reply
You don’t suppose it harms the billionaire oligarch shareholders more than the pizza shop that happens to run a website?
reply
Not having access to your pizza shop's website still beats having your restaurant bombed while you are there for take-out.

https://unn.ua/en/news/the-russian-attack-damaged-a-restaura...

reply
The billionaire tech oligarchs are owners of other Russian big tech, and they all have their own data centers. Some of them also have their own cloud services, so if anything this just redirects the money to them from Yandex Cloud.
reply
> Even if you hate Amazon or Google, you probably wouldn't want AWS or Google Cloud datacenters destroyed by Iran, because that would just affect innocent users.

Interesting take. Last I checked, those datacenters hosted software that targeted a children's school.

reply
Innocent users who voted for killing tens of thousands of civilians in Ukraine.

I guess for some definition of "innocent".

reply
How do you know how they voted ? By this logic there not a single innocent in the United States or Israel either.
reply
You people keep thinking this kind of reasoning is some kind of gotcha. It really isn't. All citizens of the US carry responsibility for the crimes you did over the last half century.
reply
deleted
reply
Lot of them are responsible, not all. Children and anti-state/anti-military-industrial-complex seem hardly responsible for example, even if most of them still profit from what the U.S.A have done in a way.
reply
80% - 90% of Russians approved the invasion of Ukraine in 2014 according to different pollsters. The assumption is they voted accordingly to make the second wave of the invasion in 2022 possible.

If - I assume there is - there is a post shared on HN about Israel and Gaza we can discuss that genocide there.

reply
Those aren’t real elections.
reply
What about the innocent users who didn't? Russia is not a democracy.
reply
There are a lot of them and not many of the dictators and his cronies. They could all do an uprising. It’s funny that a country with so much history of rebellion have leaders who have become so complacent
reply
I'm sorry for those of the 11 percent innocent (1) that are left there, happy that many fled the dictatorship.

(1) 89% of Russians approved Putin and the 2014 Crimean invasion

reply
> 89% of Russians approved Putin

According to Putin.

reply
No according to different pollsters.

Lewada, the pollster which got sacked later as a "foreign agent", got 86%

reply
86, 89 what's the difference? Putin is running a fascist elderly home at this point. Younger people in Russia won't be able to buy gas or hail a ride now.
reply
That's terrible. Meanwhile, in Ukraine they bombed another shopping center.

See the difference? Dual use / military goals vs mass murdering civilians.

reply
No, what does it matter if he has 89 or 86% approval? Obviously who cares if Russians can't hail a ride? They should've stayed home as Bohumil Hrabal used to say in Closely Observed Trains about those other invaders.
reply
seems like Russia has achieved the paradoxical form of government where it is both a perfect direct democracy and a fascist dictatorship
reply
Any remaining foreign companies doing business domestically in Russia (that thought they needed to host things in a Yandex datacenter) should be completely unsurprised by this result. As for the domestic Russians, there's a magical solution, when every square cm of Ukrainian territory is back in the hands of the UA forces, and the Russians have withdrawn back across the border, the strikes on datacenters will stop.
reply
"Russians have withdrawn back across the border, the strikes on datacenters will stop."

I'm also surprised that people can't see this simple solution to the situation.

reply
The Kremlin hates this one simple trick
reply
You know the Zeds attacked Ukrainian internet providers , attacked hospitals, train stations etc , do Zeds really expect that that Ukrainians are less capable than Ruzzians of doing the same? Or the Zeds are surprised that the decadent West is not forcing Ukraine to be kind and gentle with the "innocents" in Moscow, those poor Moscowites can't good when the AA is firing and now they might not have access to memes and videos either.
reply
I don't blame Ukraine for doing this. I understand it fully. Russia invades and attacks them, they defend and attack back. That's what war is. But I don't understand the people on HN saying this attack is somehow "good" for anyone.
reply
The tech sector in russia was fully centralized and monopolized prior to war. Destruction of the monopolies infrastructure (i hope sberbank, mailru, vk and the rest will be followed upon) will force russians to rebuild their tech sector in a healthy competitive way once the war is over. Treat drones as reactive anti-trust measures.
reply
It's good because it's a victory for Ukraine. They thought it was worth spending resources on this so clearly they think it's good for them too.
reply
The purpose of the strikes is to increase the cost to continue the war. You said in another comment that Putin is a psychopath who will always find a way to more money, but what you have not considered is that at a certain point this will become more and more difficult. Resources are finite. It’s the proverbial immovable object vs irresistible force, except without the poetic license: at some point, it will be clear that either immovable and/or irresistible are just words, and that underlying them is a reality that is not just words but made of a finite amount of will, manpower, and firepower. It’s too early to say the war will go one way or another - and it’s a big mistake to underestimate Russia - but to answer your question, the attack is “good” because that’s how you fight a war. Most of the world wants Russia to lose and therefore it is good, for us. Us is someone, just like for some Z people out there it’s good when Russia destroys a hospital, school, Ukrainian print shop, etc… bc terrorism is part of their strategy. We will see what happens.
reply
It is good if for example your country is invaded by rubots, like in Romanian election, you got Ruzzian bot famrs involved in promoting candidates agaisnt the election laws. I mean you get a candidate getting 50k likes from accounts in Asia a few seoncs after posintg soem video in Tik tok , it is obvious it was fake content and it was linked to Ruzzian citizens bot farms.

I hope that Putin will not attack again the electricity and power in Ukraine , hopefully the retard is scared now that Ukraine will bring the cold to the Moscowites and I am not happy for the children in Moscow to suffer because of the adults not giving a shit about the criminal they elected.

reply
Russia's economy was always much less diversified than any western country even before the war but now what is even left as legitimate businesses nowadays? It's just the war machine and income to fund it, mainly from raw materials.

And I'm sure these data centers were also used for military purposes, no way they weren't in the current russian environment.

reply
Incorrect, and the mental gymnastics at play here is rather telling
reply
>you probably wouldn't want AWS or Google Cloud datacenters destroyed by Iran

Huh?

reply