Cannot agree more. Looks kinda childish too.
replyIt was nice when emoji were used sparingly and with purpose and intention.
As my childhood English teacher said - too much of anything, good for nothing.
Immediate reaction - LLM generated. Hard to imagine a real human picking emojis to match feature description for a long list.
replyIt was popular before LLMs. Probably popularized by Notion.
replyIndeed, these make me back out of a project immediately if I don’t have a strong need to use it, and it takes extra cognitive effort to ignore the emojis and focus on the actually meaningful text.
replyThis one wasn't as bad as the majority that have the emoji in each header too. At least these emoji did seem to properly represent the item they're next to, not an immediate rocket ship emoji in the header following by irrelevant ones of various sizes littered throughout the text.
replyThat's interesting. In my testing, about half the participants liked them, one didn't, and the rest didn't express a strong preference.
replyI kept them because they make me smile.
To me it’s similar to what you wrote about the jokes you removed: the emojis are distracting and not actually fun. This use of emojis comes across as a tired meme. It’s better if the project makes people smile due to its intrinsic qualities like working well and doing what they want.
reply>I kept them because they make me smile.
replyBut isn't the whole point to make your users smile? No one but you cares if YOU smile.
To me an emoji-filled README is a good sign both the README and the project were generated by an LLM.
replyI needed to read your sentence a few times to figure out you don't hate README files. I too dislike emojis overuse in README files.
reply