upvote
There's a youtuber I watch who's playing through Zero Company, and I was very amused to hear NPCs yell "clanker" at enemy droids.
reply
Pretty sure the term was popularised by the Clone Wars animated series. I was always hoping we'd go the BSG route, and call them "toasters"
reply
[dead]
reply
You're one of today's lucky 10,000 [0]

[0] https://xkcd.com/1053/

reply
For me it’s a strong indicator that we’re not going to hear any serious thought from someone that uses it. It’s part of a herd behavior, to signal an ideological position.
reply
lol what are you talking about, clanker is a pretty ubiquitous term in sf right now
reply
Your statement proves the point more than disproves it tbh.
reply
That only supports my point.
reply

  >  It’s part of a herd behavior, to signal an ideological position.
You can just use a word that other use in order to be understood by them, not to signal anything.
reply
It’s ideological in that it’s generally used by people that are anti-AI, or are trying to call out some perceived problem with AI.

In my experience, as I alluded to, it’s not commonly used by people who are thinking seriously for themselves about the benefits, risks, and consequences of AI and the economic activity surrounding it.

reply
Lol idk about that, some of the biggest AI fans at work use it. It's just common slang now, you're assigning too much to it
reply
> It’s ideological in that it’s generally used by people that are anti-AI

It's much more nuanced, after all. Example:

https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/5/26/clankers/

reply
That article only confirms what I’m saying. The author is describing their personal perspective on the word, but that’s not how it’s used in general, which is why the author received pushback on their undocumented and idiosyncratic usage.
reply
I literally run an AI startup; we all talk about the clankers and have for more than a year
reply
Lighten up, dude, it's a joke.
reply
I’m never going to “lighten up” about anti-intellectual Luddites who try to use social coercion to suppress intellectual progress.
reply