upvote
This is objectively not true because there are companies, even banks, where this level of stupidity has not prevailed. In turn this implies that the others are doing something which is different but possible, and the scoundrel companies could be doing that too.

Even if the something is no more than engaging less fatuous attorneys.

reply
> there are companies, even banks, where this level of stupidity has not prevailed

Yes, because that particular set of lawyers haven’t said it has to be blocked. Doesn’t mean my statement that lawyers have final say is “objectively not true”.

reply
> This is objectively not true because there are companies, even banks, where this level of stupidity has not prevailed.

All it takes for this to happen is the lawyers not knowing.

reply