It lacks in... everything.

Like when you were a kid goofing around with some art supplies and you tried to mix every color of crayons, markers, watercolors, and/or colored pencils together to be both anything and everything all at the same time: It's just a sea of homogeneous brown yuck.

That homogenized yuck might work for code that is ultimately interpreted by a machine and that performs some kind of human-described function, but in writing (and in menu boards) it's just highly-emphatic sludge.

Everything. It's horrible. Bad colors, cringe delivery, awkward prose.

It's quintessential ai slop.

But that's fine, because nobody forced me to read it, so I'm unbothered.

> "high converting UX patterns"

That _is_ the problem: ostensibly serious writing laced with marketing / clickbaity patterns is off-putting.

The homogenization of the internet. The worst corporate speak PR pages are now what gets generated for every pet project