upvote
No this is more like having someone standing over your cubicle, and every other person's cubicle, taking notes of every time you go to the bathroom or get a drink of water or stretch.

Watching you.

All day.

every day.

reply
Yeah if it were like being in office then the request to make it less frequent would have been the same and been granted
reply
Taking pictures inside people’s privately owned homes is very different from a wide shot cctv camera in a company-owned building.
reply
What, like you can't be lazy in person?

Also there shouldn't be a monitoring program hooked into office CCTV either.

reply
The steel man argument is that WFO means a manager can screen glance as they are walking the floor. That can catch the worst slacking or possible contract violations like outsourcing the work.

If slacking risks randomly getting caught and fired or takes too much work to hide, then folks are more likely to just do the work or quit.

reply
Seeing the screen, or even an activity log, is far less invasive than nearly constant monitoring of the worker's face. That steelman is built for a different debate.
reply