upvote
reply
An invitation for a semantic debate online on a minor point along with a random linked in post stating something about said debate?

No thank you says pretty much everyone.

reply
Yeah, I was about to comment that I’m not reading all that. But good for them though.
reply
Then why is it marketed like one? And why can I use it like a tool?

I do have to send input to the thing to get a response, no?

reply
Sure it is. And it's AI, not 'AI' -- not sure why the need to add quoting.
reply
It's literally the title. It seems every reply to this is just someone saying they didn't read it.
reply
Correct. The headline is incorrect with both the quoting of AI as well as the claim it isn't a tool.

You can hardly blame anyone for avoiding a clickthrough into an auth-walled, user-hostile site to read the point the headline made in an attempt to "gotcha"

reply
deleted
reply
deleted
reply
[flagged]
reply
[flagged]
reply
Are you saying I am an llm?
reply
You know that enticing someone to commit suicide is a crime in most of the jurisdictions?
reply
For now, an AI agent is not a 'someone'
reply