I don't think the post was written by AI.
replyIt has headers like AI blogposts, and features a lot of parallel structure like AI blogposts ("there's no <blank>. you <blank>"), but if you actually read it none of it reads like slop. To me anyway.
Interestingly, Pangram says that exactly the first 50% is AI and the second half is not. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
replyNot that those tools are that accurate
replyYou could have saved milliseconds and used a pseudo random number generator.
replyIt reads like autism to me. The theme confirms that.
reply[flagged]
reply