upvote
> compensated as [...] shareholders.

Don't all shares / options go to zero in Chapter 11, or is that only true in Chapter 7 when the lenders take over?

In any case, I'm not sure Character.ai's assets will be worth much or that the employees will have any sort of liquidation preference.

reply
Equity holders have a more junior claim than debt holders, but if there are enough dollars in the bankrupt company to make the debt holders whole, the equity holders get whatever is left over (obviously in order of seniority).
reply
They were likely paid out at the same time other investors were when Noam et al went to Google.

The fact that the legal entity has no money doesn't mean they didn't get paid.

You can figure out a bit about what likely happened by what is not happening. NVIDIA/Groq are being sued for leaving former employees out of the acquisition: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/05/nvidia-groq-deal-stockholder...

Which to me implies that in that case, at least current employees were taken care of, and the court will likely force the former employees to also be taken care of because Delaware law doesn't like it when you discriminate in ways that were not spelled out ahead of time.

reply
There was a Supreme Court case that essentially established that Common stockholders can be practically ignored as part of leadership’s fiduciary duty. It revolved around an ex-employee suing for compensation for Common stock after a merger that paid out the CEO and preferred shareholders, leaving stockholders zero.

This is also partially why your common stock options can be valued significantly less than the price the company value would imply: because it’s not an even share in the business.

reply
This is not true.

Assuming you're talking about the Trados Inc litigation, the situation was:

* Raised 52m

* Acquired for 52m

* 8m paid to exec team to stay in place

* Common stock got zero

The lawsuit determined that the board did have a fiduciary duty to the common stock, but that the common stock had no economic value, so they were not actually being harmed here, aka this is basically the best deal the company could have gotten, but it didn't clear the pref stack.

In the Groq/Character deals, they very obviously cleared the pref stack, so common stock deserves to get a piece of the licensing deal at the rate of the stock they held. It's annoying because its a dividend and doesn't benefit from QSBS, etc, but common stock is getting paid there.

reply
I swear this is what's so risky about AI startups, they've completely changed the risk/reward calculus that we all used to be okay with.

You join a company, are granted ISOs/RSUs/etc, and they matter at some point when a liquidity event happens.

Now the liquidity events are "acquihireasitions", the execs and senior AI/ML eng get buyouts to go to a new company -- everyone else: regular eng, designers, PMs, marketers, recruiting, etc. everyone else is just left with nothing.

I wouldn't join an AI startup unless I was on the ML side, and I'm not: I'm just a "regular ass product engineer" so screw me I guess.

reply
This is just not true.

Everyone who had stock (including common stock) at character.ai was bought out at the $2.6bn price: https://www.theinformation.com/articles/google-hires-charact...

The buyout included guaranteed payouts for people who had unvested stock for 2 years post-acquisition.

These transactions are opaque and confusing, but employees are generally not being fucked over here.

reply
[dead]
reply
deleted
reply
deleted
reply