upvote
Apple literally does do the same thing. Especially (!) with Apple TV. Go read the eula's again. Apple TV, Apple Maps & Apple News all perform data mining largely akin to how their competitors do it. There are specific carve outs for those three services.
reply
A quick search suggests that Roku does ~380 network requests per hour. LG smart TVs running webOS typically generate regular hourly background checks, plus periodic or continuous telemetry and Automatic Content Recognition requests.

Does Apple TV even do ACR in any form? Is it scanning my network and phoning home about it?

reply
Ah nice. You know Apple literally invented Bonjour and mDNS? They know what's on your network. The only difference is that we applaud them for it. Does the apple tv do acr? It has to, to do the first party "magic" it does. Again, we just applaud them for it because they "only use it for first party services." Why are you so offended that Apple is just another for profit megacorp.
reply
> Does the apple tv do acr? It has to, to do the first party "magic" it does.

I'm sorry, you're stating this like some obvious fact. Apple has previously said this is not the case and they do not do ACR. The Apple TV is the only Apple device I have, so you can set aside any reflexive critiques of my brand loyalty. What is your precise claim? Why am I a dullard for reading that Apple TV does not use ACR and believing it?

The entire reason I bought an Apple TV was to reduce the amount of data skimming happening in the background and ads being shoved in front of my face in the foreground, it's not like I'm lousy with options.

reply
> Apple has previously said this is not the case and they do not do ACR.

The problem is that you need to trust Apple, and verifying what is going on is difficult. Apple controls the device entirely, and the user is captive because the hardware cannot be repurposed. The "hacker community" should simply reject these user-hostile devices that feel like jails.

reply
deleted
reply
> Does the apple tv do acr? It has to, to do the first party "magic" it does.

You're just making stuff up. Apple TV does not do ACR.

Apple does provide a TV App API that allows select app developers to get a special entitlement allowing them to contribute viewing data. Read this carefully: https://developer.apple.com/support/terms/apple-developer-pr...

"Apple will obtain user consent based on the user’s Apple Account before including Your Licensed Application in the TV App Features displayed under that Apple Account. Apple will also provide users with the ability to withdraw such consent at any time thereafter and to delete their TV App Data from Apple’s systems."

reply
I don’t think the evidence supports this. I have all five generations of Apple TV, including the original x86 box, and I’ve monitored their network traffic with sniffers. Nothing unusual has come out of any of them.
reply
deleted
reply
It’s quite a take to make lan sharing some kind of grand conspiracy. Is LAN manager sus too?
reply
I just cant have a rational discussion with apple folks. Not here, not anywhere else. Its emotions and double values all way down.

For profit org that has its personalized ad part of business growing massively, is scanning all your photos, gives all data to NSA like there is no tomorrow is somehow better, becase carefully crafted PR said so.

Especially if one is not US citizen, or multinational, or US citizen not on US soil, and so on.

They make great, hard vendor-locked hardware and mediocre software. Lets keep them at that and not some magical privacy champions when they are not, not where it actually matters.

reply
> I just cant have a rational discussion with apple folks. Not here, not anywhere else. Its emotions and double values all way down.

Your post doesn't sound any different, what with the tarring a group of people with the same brush.

You've decided that your feelings about a type of company trump anybody else's opinions about a particular company. With a fairly derisive tone, at that.

reply
> You've decided that your feelings about a type of company trump anybody else's opinions about a particular company.

Isn't that what they are actually complaining against? This is just circular reasoning.

reply
> Its emotions and double values all way down.

I even had a mod here tell me that's not the case..lol

reply
I'm not piling on, just an honest question.

Do you consider Final Cut Pro and Logic Pro as mediocre?

reply
Strawman. Those are professional softwares, whereas iOS is used by a lot more people daily and is bundled (and locked) to the purchased hardware. Very recently, iOS bricked users' devices and the only way is to get a hardware replacement. Every year, iOS is only becoming shittier and it's public knowledge at this point. Look at glass UI, all the buggy half-assed implementations all over.
reply
I have plenty of evidence that Apple is the best option for me. The problem is when people say, much like your comment, that this doesn't matter or doesn't mean anything in the face of all the controversies they've been involved with. That feels more emotions and double values than anything to me.
reply
Unlike their competitors, Apple does not do Automatic Content Recognition (ACR). That matters to me.
reply
Knowing Apple, they won't call it ACR. Just like Apple calling AI "Apple Inteligence". They are too hip for using common word.
reply
Nobody cares if they call it ACR or not. They're not doing it. By any name.

Apple Intelligence takes a single screenshot of your screen when you explicitly direct it to. It does not take routine or scheduled screenshots and it does not exfiltrate or otherwise use the information other than to answer your query.

Private Cloud Compute goes to great lengths to prove it can't violate your privacy. In general, Apple likes to back itself up like this, which is one of the reasons I have such high confidence in them.

reply
> Apple literally does do the same thing. ... all perform data mining largely akin to how their competitors do it.

Funny how the OP carefully skimmed this part out in their reply, but BINGO, I think this is the attitude we should have towards privacy. Sometimes I just feel like we're talking to a bunch of bots on here when it comes to privacy with their blind support towards for-profit corporations that doesn't give a shit about them.

reply
> the OP carefully skimmed this part out

lol

>we're talking to a bunch of bots on here

Ah. Okay. In a different tenor of conversation I'd be happy to clarify but...not when I'm up against this.

reply
The distortion field is powerful.

Keep the firewall of skepticism high.

reply
What is a better solution here? What is something that lets me stream from the major services, has a good-enough remote, and doesn't require any fiddling on my part?

I've always seen Apple TV as the least-bad option compared to Roku/Fire/whatever Google is doing these days/literally any built-in solution.

reply
> I've always seen Apple TV as the least-bad option compared to Roku

If this was your original statement, I think we all would be on your side - I even use an Apple TV 4k personally and love it. It definitely is the best in the market for what it does.

> it's the one box I can (reasonably) trust to not be mining my viewing habits for data.

Instead, you framed it as the only privacy-friendly option and that is logically and factually incorrect.

reply
I think you read a bunch into my stuff and then responded to the arguments you thought I was making, then accused me of craftily dodging things, then implied I was a bot.
reply
I hear you. If Apple TV had better quality A/V and streaming, it would be my unequivocal recommendation. It’s still great, but if you’re an AV snob there’s better.
reply
Can you elaborate? I just added FEL support to https://pixelbrite.site Email j@pixelbrite. site for a Test Flight
reply
what?
reply
[flagged]
reply
I think it depends on what you prioritize. I have an Apple TV, but also LG and Samsung smart TVs as well as Google TV Streamer.

They come with different tradeoffs wrt price, A/V quality, user interface, privacy, etc.

For me, the #1 thing is A/V quality. I don’t care about price, but most people do.

reply
I want something that's capable, not fiddly, and reasonably respects my privacy. I haven't found a better product in this segment yet.
reply
I believe you could buy a random Android streaming box with an unlocked bootloader, and then install LineageOS on it. Not sure about the “streams from all the major services” part re: LineageOS, but last I heard it’s improving.

(There are also some boxes made specifically for this, usually sold as development platforms for STB products, marketed based on what SoC they contain. Though they’ll tend to be $200, while the random “finished product” streaming box will be more like $30. Both come with decent remotes.)

reply
> I believe you could buy a random Android streaming box with an unlocked bootloader

Is there any examples of this that isn't an obscure model last sold in 2015? This would be quite compelling as an alternative to a Linux box, especially now that hardware is expensive again. You don't really need Netflix et al if you can open a Web browser and head for the sea.

reply
LineageOS on a cheap box will be L3 widevine, and fail play integrity, which means netflix and a bunch of other streaming apps won't even install. Even if you can get them to install, the L3 will stop you from viewing Prime, Disney+ or other similar services at anything better than SD.

I'm also interested in alternatives, but LineageOS on a cheap box isn't really one.

reply
> netflix and a bunch of other streaming apps won't even install.

You don't need Netflix, Prime, or Disney+. Don't be a sheep, build a collection of Linux ISOs and/or use your Web browser. There is plenty of content out there.

reply
> There is plenty of content out there.

“Content”. Yuck. I’m a discerning series and film watcher.

reply
> I can (reasonably) trust to not be mining my viewing habits for data

That's precisely what you did.

reply
One of the products you mentioned is named Home View. It's right there. Both new SKUs ship with their voice assistant interface to Google Gemini (and friends) in an environment where memory and storage availability is being monopolized by cloud infrastructure.
reply
> Does Apple do the same thing?

Yes, they did:

https://www.reuters.com/legal/apple-pay-95-million-settle-si...

    Apple routinely recorded their private conversations after they activated Siri unintentionally, and disclosed these conversations to third parties such as advertisers.

Can you prove they aren't actively doing it now?

edit: link

reply
https://www.reuters.com/technology/apple-clarifies-siri-priv...

"Apple has never used Siri data to build marketing profiles, never made it available for advertising, and never sold it to anyone for any purpose," Apple said on Wednesday.

Unintentionally activating Siri and then recording is very different from the active listening things going on. Shared with advertisers was speculation.

reply
A billion dollar company's public statement defending itself of a crime it was accused of committing and is sued for, is the source of truth now and what it was actually accused of doing is considered speculation? Sure.
reply
Since you clearly know something the rest of the world's regulators do not, you should file a multi-billion lawsuit and get your money.
reply
Since you clearly know something the rest of the world's regulators do not, you should get an unpaid employee of the year award and get your money.

Again, you don't know they aren't doing any of these privacy violations again right now. You are just vomiting their marketing BS again and again "Apple means privacy". Historically their shady acts weren't discovered until much later - battery gate, siri lawsuit, etc. You're starting on personal attacks and sounding more like a bot, so I'm going to stop here.

reply
> You're starting on personal attacks

and then

> and sounding more like a bot

Pot, kettle, etc.

Per HN guidelines: "Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes."

reply
>Yes, they did

This has nothing to do with the specific question I asked, and I'm not sure why you'd think so unless Roku has some kind of Siri-like feature (which wasn't what I was intending when I asked regardless). (also, that's a dead link)

reply
You did mention "monetizing everything you do (on your television)", my answer was for that part. Again, my question to you is - it's closed source, do you have proof they aren't actually doing it? Or are you going to wait for another half a decade for another lawsuit to find out?

My point is, it's a for-profit corporation. And a really efficient one. They don't care about anyone's privacy or anything else. Only profits. History has proof - battery gate, siri lawsuit, etc.

reply
Are we really asking for people to prove negatives now?
reply