upvote
Then you just need a programming language that accepts ≠ as a synonym of !=. But who knows, maybe there is already one?
reply
Rakulang has you covered.

It is aggressive in its unicode support. You want to use vulgar fractions? Or Mayan numerals? They'll work. You want to use mathematical notation like ∈? It works.

You can literally do this:

`my $var = ⅒ + 2 + Ⅻ;`

https://docs.raku.org/language/unicode_ascii

reply
Julia example: https://juliamono.netlify.app/#fnref:zscode

I can't include an example here because VC News strips out math.

reply
Mostly it strips out ‘math variable names that jerks would use to embolden their spam headlines for emphasis’, which is indeed annoying and results in this:

∂ₓₙ = [(₁ ⊗ ʹ) (₂ ⊗ ʹ) ( ⊗ ₁) ( ⊗ ₂)]

And last I checked, BPL is in the same boat.

reply
Or just pipe your source through a sed script that replaces one with the other before compiling/running.
reply
Yes, but why?
reply
[dead]
reply
I wish more languages other than Raku did this. But no, not equal is written as surprised equal. And if something ought to be less or equal, you have to write a fat arrow pointing left. :/
reply
Not true: you can use the unicode equivalent as well:

say 42 ≤ 666; # True

say 42 ≠ 666; # True

say 42 ≥ 666; # False

For a full list, see https://docs.raku.org/language/unicode_ascii#Other_acceptabl...

reply
deleted
reply
But languages are made by older or less progressive people, so of course you can't use ≠ Unicode in your language enforcing ascii
reply