I've spent years avoiding lisp, I am not about to break that streak now.
replyAll jokes aside, I genuinely think that non-algol syntax is a non-starter. We're too far along now, that it's easier for these features to come to java/rust/typescript/cpp than it is to switch completely to academic langs that have terrible tooling support.
The tooling around S-expression syntaxes is almost necessarily better than others because it's so straightforward, eg, structure-based editing operations. The "problem" with IDE integration for such languages is generally the (lack of) availability of static information, especially due to Racket's expressive arbitrarily-many-phased macro system, but that's a separate axis of language design.
replyThat said, the parent comment explicitly pointed out Rhombus as an alternative to an S-expression syntax within that same community, so maybe you could look into that suggestion instead of being pithy about topics in which you are less well informed.